My DDU point form notes on mitral regurgitation…
- ANATOMY OF MITRAL VALVE
- apparatus
- annulus
- leaflets
- chordae
- Carpentier nomenclature
- MR MECHANISM
- primary (valvular)
- secondary (functional)
- MR due to LVOT obstruction
- MVP
- Carpentier classification
- BASIC ASSESSMENT
- leaflets
- annulus
- consider loading conditions / rhythm
- colour Doppler
- spectral
- QUANTITATION
- vena contracta
- PISA (proximal isovelocity surface area)
- volumetric methods
- 3D
- VALUES
- ACUTE MR
The rest of my DDU notes are here.
ANATOMY OF MITRAL VALVE
apparatus
annulus, leaflets, chordae, papillary muscles (LA, LV walls)
annulus
D shaped
saddle shaped
anterior and posterior points superior (towards LA)
shape changes during cycle
=aortomitral curtain, next to left and noncoronary cusp
more rigid than elsewhere
posterior annulus longer than anterior
dilates > anterior
leaflets
anterior
2/3 of area, thicker, D shaped
no true anatomic separations • 3 segments
posterior
crescent, 2/3 of attachment to annulus
3 scallops
chordae
3 types
primary to margins
rupture → flail / prolapse
secondary to body
tertiary to base
from papillary mm
posteromedial
more prone to infarction (RCA territory)
anterolateral
which is actually on the posterolateral wall!
Carpentier nomenclature
1’s are antero1ateral, 3’s are postero3edial
MR MECHANISM
determines therapy
primary (valvular)
leaflets / chordal – Mx usually surgical
degeneration
MVP commonest 1° cause, myxomatous change
ruptured chordae
thickening / Ca2+
MAC may have mitral stenosis also
infectious
endocarditis
inflammatory
Libmann-Sacks lesions
rheumatic, radiation, and drugs
all cause leaflet thickening / restricted posterior leaflet
congenital
cleft / endocardial cushion defect
secondary (functional)
term sometimes used to mean non-ischaemic, usually ischaemic
commonest cause
Δ geometry
commonly myocardial dilation and ↓ systolic function (especially posterior / inferior wall)
→ papillary muscle dysfunction (lateral / posterior and apical displacement) and annular flattening / dilatation
→ tethering, incomplete coaptation
“ischaemic” MR
commonly due to remodelling, but occasionally
papillary m rupture
acute and transient with AMI
functional MR → higher periop mortality for CABG
TTE assessment
A4C best
tenting seen best on anterior valve leaflet
bend in leaflet from 2° cord
normal convex shape → concave
can measure
tethering height: distance from mitral annulus plane to coaptation point in systole, ≥11mm significant
tethering area
Mx
revascularise
ACEI, statins, β blockers,… ie Rx CHF
consider biventricular pacing
Rx AF
± surgical intervention
MR due to LVOT obstruction
underfilling, tachycardic hyperdynamic LV with low afterload → high velocity jets → AMVL sucked into jet by Venturi (SAM)
common post MV repair
potentially with undersized annuloplasty ring or long posterior leaflet → anterior coaptation point → redundant mitral tissue sucked in
echo features
2D: SAM
CFD: jet usually directed slightly posteriorly → systolic aliasing in LVOT
spectral Doppler: dagger shape CWD with late systolic peak (since LVOT gradient ↑ progressively during systole)
see in TG mid long axis or deep TG LV
MVP
displacement of mitral leaflets during systole > 2mm from annular plane
spectrum from minimal prolapse to flail
thick (>5mm) leaflets, ≥ moderate MR and LVEF <50% → worse prognosis
Carpentier classification
based on leaflet motion
type 1: normal leaflet motion
annular dilatation, perforation
type 2: ↑ motion
billowing / scalloping: body protrudes above annular plane in systole but point of coaptation below annular plane
prolapse: tip above annular plane in systole
flail: mitral leaflet flows freely into LA, loss of normal concave shape
usually ruptured chordae
always significant, often severe MR
type 3: ↓ motion
3a: systole and diastole
eg rheumatic heart disease
3b: systole only
commonly functional
BASIC ASSESSMENT
leaflets
thickened, Ca2+?
redundant?
intact?
motion: normal, excessive, restricted?
coaptation point: below, at, above annular plane? no coaptation?
annulus
TOE: diameter in bicommisural (~60°) and anteroposterior (~150°)
normal 28-32 mm; dilates posteriorly
consider loading conditions / rhythm
GA will ↓ apparent severity by 1 full grade
colour Doppler
gain, Nyquist optimised
jet direction
functional slightly posterior
very eccentric (>45°) → structural
Carpentier
type 1 (N motion): usually central
type 2 (↑ motion): usually away from diseased leaflet
type 3a (↓ motion): usually toward diseased leaflet
type 3b (↓ motion, but because posteromedial PM attaches to both → affects both leaflets): slightly posterior
jet surface area
severe
>40% of LA better than absolute area vs angiographic standard, but measure both in same systolic frame
>10 cm2
big Otto
Nyquist ≥ 50 cm/s
avoid including low velocity nonturbulent blood flows in measurement
average area on multiple views
easy to miss / underestimate eccentric jets
MR jet size affected by containment by LA wall, flow influences by pulmonary veins ∴ don’t overinterpret
wall hugging
coanda effect → jets appear smaller
nearly always structural
spectral
peak velocity
LV to LA gradient
density varies with machine setting and alignment of CW beam ∴ supportive only
dense, sharp, complete → more severe
pulmonary blood flow supportive only per Otto
PWD 1-2cm into pulmonary vein
S wave blunting or reversal S2 wave first → haemodynamically significant
big Otto: any cause of ↑ LAP (LV dysfunction, AF) will blunt S wave cf reversal fairly specific
Oxorn: “in presence of MR, (reversal is) specific but not sensitive”
if v eccentric can be just one pulmonary vein → pulse all if possible
QUANTITATION
vena contracta
per big Otto
area is effective orifice area
remember flow continues to converge for a short distance beyond the anatomic orifice
less influenced by loading / haemodynamic factors / wall impingement than jet area methods
use views orthogonal to MV coaptation line ie long axis PLAX, A3C
per Oxorn
MO long axis, zoomed
Nyquist ~55 cm/s
<3 mm mild, >7 severe
pitfall
may be oval vena contracta → don’t rely on this one measurement
need to see whole jet in continuity (flow convergence → vena contracta → distal jet) to be reliable
PISA (proximal isovelocity surface area)
presence of a PISA suggests significant MR
if peak MR velocity ~5 m/s AND Nyquist 40 cm/s shift baseline then regurgitant orifice area = r2 / 2
simplification of flow = area x velocity
at orifice: ROA x peak MR velocity
at PISA shell: Nyquist x 2πr2
these flows are the same
so solving for ROA = Nyquist x 2πr2 / peak MR velocity
if incomplete PISA shell, needs angle correction (α / 180)
> 0.4 cm2 (40 mm2) → severe
ROA x MR VTI = regurgitant volume (>60 ml)
RV / LVOT SV = regurgitant fraction (>50%)
many assumptions
regurgitant orifice is round
one orifice
PISA is complete hemisphere, not cone or flattened hemisphere
big Otto
∴ Nyquist needs to be low cf regurgitant velocity,
inaccurate with flail due to constraint,
results vary widely when radius measured at different distances from orifice
measure along beam, not across (underestimation due to colour dropout)
all measurements made at same point in cardiac cycle
big Otto: ROA Δ during systole
→ avoid PISA radius measurement v early or late in systole, flow rate not at equilibrium
ideally at same time as peak MR velocity, ~mid systole or at T wave
volumetric methods
reproducible results need significant training • many sources of error
basic idea
MR volume = mitral inflow – aortic outflow
= CSAmitral inflow x VTImitral inflow – aortic outflow
details
PWD at mitral annular plane for VTImitral inflow
CSAmitral inflow = πr2
problem: annulus not circular, though more circular in MR than normal due to dilation
aortic outflow = CSAAo x VTIAo
assumes no AR
alternative approach
MR volume = LV stroke volume by planimetry – aortic outflow volume, again assuming no AR
3D
useful for mechanism, planning surgical Mx, ?role of leaflet stress
direct planimetry of vena contracta area
without geometric assumptions
do full volume 3D colour of 7-14 cycles
narrow sector to ↑ frame rate
correlates well with Doppler, MR volume on MRI
spatial resolution main limitation → don’t bother if not at least moderate
VALUES
Mild | Mod | Severe | |
---|---|---|---|
Jet area / LA | <20% | >40% | |
<4cm2 Oxorn | >10 cm2 Oxorn | ||
Vena contracta (cm) | <0.3 | ≥0.7 | |
PISA radius (Nyquist 40 cm/s) | <0.4 | >1.0 | |
Regurgitant volume (mL) | <30 | 31-59 | ≥60 |
Regurgitant fraction (%) | <30 | 31-49 | ≥50% |
Regurgitant orifice area (cm 2 ) | <0.2 | 0.21-0.39 | ≥0.40 |
or 40mm2 | |||
Other features from Oxorn and Otto | |||
LA and LV size nonspecific | normal | normal / dilated | usually dilated |
other 2D features | may see ruptured chordae, papillary muscle, flail leaflet | ||
colour Doppler | swirling in LA | ||
pulse wave Doppler | |||
mitral inflow | A dominant | variable | E dominant |
since correlates with D on pulmonary veins | |||
jet density | faint, incomplete | dense | dense |
contour | parabolic | usually parabolic | early peaking, triangular |
PV flow | S dominant | S blunted | systolic reversal |
other: ↑ RVSP |
ACUTE MR
sudden volume load
no time to adapt
APO, ↑ R sided pressures, SOB
hyperdynamic LV but unable to dilate adequately → ↓ CO, ↓ BP
Rx
fast, full and forward
∴ vasodilators (if BP allows), IABP
urgent surgery
Cover image: “Starr-Edwards-Mitral-Valve” by Dr. Mirko Junge
Tags: DDU DDU Notes mitral regurgitation